Breeding Grain Sorghum for Tolerance to Aluminium Toxicity

Authors

  • E. J. Too Department of Biological Sciences, University of Eldoret, P. O. Box 1125, Eldoret, Kenya
  • S. Gudu Rongo University, P. O. Box 103-40404, Rongo, Kenya
  • B. A. Were Department of Biological Sciences, University of Eldoret, P. O. Box 1125, Eldoret, Kenya
  • A. O. Onkware Rongo University, P. O. Box 103-40404, Rongo, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2200/aerj.v4i1.93

Keywords:

Aluminium Toxicity, Segregating Populations, Sorghum Seedlings, Relative Net Root Growth

Abstract

Aluminium (Al) toxicity is a common problem in acid soils where sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is grown. It contributes to grain yield reduction of between 30-40 % in sorghum and other cereals. Al interferes with plant development by inhibiting root growth, thus contributing to reduced uptake of water and mineral nutrients. The main aim of this study was to transfer Al tolerance to a local farmer preferred commercial variety. The specific objectives of the study were to (i) assess aluminium stress response of F2 sorghum segregating populations derived from a cross between Seredo and ICSR 110 together with the parental lines and the F1 hybrid in solution culture and (ii) to assess growth and production of the same panel of sorghum genotypes when grown in acidic soils with and without application of lime. A cross was made between Seredo (Al-sensitive commercial variety) and ICSR 110 (Al-resistant line). In the laboratory, seedlings of F1s and F2s and the parental lines were grown in nutrient solution culture without or with Al at 148M and 222 M. The percent relative net root growth (% RNRG) and percent response were used to classify the populations into tolerant and sensitive to Al stress. In the field the parental lines, F1s and nine F2 segregating populations were grown in acid soil (pH 4.3) with high Al saturation (27%) without or with application of lime. The total number of leaves, plant height and seed yield per plant were evaluated. The F1s and some individual F2s performed better than the Al tolerantparent both in solution culture and under field conditions. Al tolerance was therefore successfully transferred into the Al sensitive variety. The superior progenies developed need to be advanced to a stable generation and released to sorghum farmers

References

Anas, S. M., Noladhi, W., and Meddy, R. (2019). Genetic gain of Al tolerance and contribution of agronomic traits on Al tolerance in the early stage of sorghum breeding program. Plant Production

Science. 22(2): 319-326

Anglani, C. (1998). Sorghum for human food: a review. Plant Foods Human Nutrition. 52:85-89.

Baligar, V.C. and Smedley, M.D. (1989). Responses of forage grasses to aluminium in solution culture. J. Plant Nutr. 12: 595603.

Caniato, F.F., Guimaraes, C.T., Schaffert, R.E., Alves, V.M.C., Kochian, L.V., Boren, A., Klein, P.E. and Magalhaes, J.V. (2007a.) Genetic diversity for aluminium resistance in sorghum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114:863876.

Caniato, F.F., Guimaraes, C.T., Hamblin, M., Billot, C., Rami, J-F., Hutnagel, B., Kochian, L.V., Liu, J., Garcia, A.A., Hash, C.T., Ramu, P., Mitchell, S., Kresovich, S., Oliveira, A.C., Avella, G., Borem, A., Glaszmann, J.C., Schaffert, R.E. and Magalhaes, J.V. (2011). The Relationship between population structure and aluminium tolerance in cultivated sorghum. PLos ONE6(6):e20830.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020 830.

Fontecha, G., Silva-Navas, J. Benito, C., Metres, M.A., Espino, F.J., Hernandez-Riquer, M.V. and Gallego, F.J. (2007). Candidate gene identification of an aluminum-activated organic acid transporter gene at the Alt4 locus for aluminum resistance in rye (Secale cereale, L.). Theor. Appl. Genet 114:249260.

Getahum, D., Dessalegn, T., Bekele, A. and Bogale, W. (2018). Response of sorghum and soybean to lime and phosphorus application and its subsequent effect on acidity of soils in Assosa Area. In Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrient Management (Eds Getachew, A., Gebreyes, G.m Tolera, A and Muleta, D.). Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research. Addis Ababa.

Hoekenga, O.A., Maron, L.G., Cançado, G.M.A., Piñeros, M.A., Shaff, J., Kobayashi, Y., Ryan, P.R., Dong, B., Delhaize, E. Sasaki, T., Matsumoto, H., Yamamoto, Y., Koyama, H. and Kochian, L.V. (2006). AtALMTI, which encodes a malate transporter, is identified as one of several genes critical for aluminium tolerance in arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA 103:9738-9743.

Horst, W.J., Wang, Y. and Eticha, D. (2010). the role of the root apoplast in aluminiuminduced inhibition of root elongation and in aluminium resistance of plants: a review. Annals of Botany 106: 185-197.

House, L. R. (1985). A Guide to Sorghum Breeding, 2nd edn. Patancheru, A.P. 502324, India. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. pp 102-103.

Kanyanjua, S.M., Iren, I., Wambua, S and Nandwa S.M. (2002). Acidic Soils in Kenya: Constraints and Remedial Options. KARI Technical Notes No. 11. pp 28.

Kidd, P.S. and Proctor, J. (2001). Why plants grow poorly on very acid soils: are ecologists missing the obvious? J.Exp.Bot. 52:791799.

Kindraide, T.B. (1997). Reconsidering the rhizotoxicity of hydroxyl sulphate and fluoride complexes of aluminium. J.Exp.Bot. 48: 1115-1124.

Kisinyo, (2011). Constraints of Soil Acidity and Nutrient Depletion on Maize (Zea mays, L.) Production in Kenya. D. Phil Thesis, Moi University, Kenya

Kochian, L.V., Piñeros, M.A and Hoekenga, A.O. 2005. The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminium resistance and toxicity. Plant and Soil. 274:175-195.

Magalhaes, J.V., Garvin, D.F., Wang, Y., Sorrels, M.E., Klein, P.E., Schaffert, R.E., Li, L. and Kochian, L.V. (2004). Comparative mapping of a major aluminium resistance gene in sorghum and other species of the poaceae, Genetics 167: 1905-1914.

Magnavaca, R., Gardner, C. and Clark, R. (1987). Comparison of maize populations for aluminium resistance in nutrient solution. In Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition (Gabelman, H. and Loughman, B.C. - Eds). Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp 189-199.

Mariano, E.D. and Keltjens, W.G. (2003). Evaluating the role of root citrate exudation as a mechanism of aluminium resistance in maize genotypes. Plant Soil 256:469-479.

Mossor-Pietraszewska, T. (2001). Effect of aluminium on plant growth and metabolism. Acta Biomica Polonica Vol 48: 673-686.

Obura, P. A. (2008). Effects of soil properties on bioavailability of aluminium and phosphorus in selected Kenyan and Brazilian soils. Ph.D Thesis, Purdue University, USA.

Ringo, J.H., Mneney, E.E., Onkware, A.O., Were, B.A., Too, E.J., Owuoche, J.O. and Gudu,S. (2010). Tolerance to aluminium toxicity in Tanzanian sorghum genotypes. African Crop Science Journal. 18 (4):155164.

Ryan, P.R., Tyerman, S.D., Sasaki, T., Furuichi, T., Yamamoto Y., Zhang, W.H. and Delhaize, E. (2011). The identification of aluminium-resistance genes provides opportunities for enhancing crop production on acid soils. Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 62, No. 1: 9-20.

Sanchez, P.A. and Salinas, J.G. 1981. Low-input technology for managing oxisols and Ultisols in tropical America. Advances in Agronomy. 34:279-406.

Too, E. J. (2011). Physiological and Molecular Characterization of Resistance to Aluminium Stress in Selected Grain Sorghums. D. Phil Thesis, Moi University, Kenya.

Vitorello, V.A., Capaldi, F.R. and Stefanuto, V.A. (2005). Recent advances in aluminium toxicity and resistance in higher plants. Braz.J.Plant Physiol. 17 (1):129-143.

Wright, C. P., Kibite, S., Tinker, N. A. and Molnar, S. J. (2006). Identification of molecular markers for aluminium resistance in diploid oat through comparative mapping and QTL analysis. Ther.Appl Genet. 112:222-231.

Zakir Hossain, A.K.M., Koyama, H. and Hara, T. (2006). Growth and cell wall properties of two wheat cultivars differing in their sensitivity to aluminium stress. Journal of Plant physiology 163:39-47.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

How to Cite

Too, E. J., Gudu, . S., Were, B. A., & Onkware, A. O. (2020). Breeding Grain Sorghum for Tolerance to Aluminium Toxicity. Africa Environmental Review Journal, 4(1), Pg 123–136. https://doi.org/10.2200/aerj.v4i1.93