Strategic Environmental Assessment Law in Kenya: Lacunae and Consensus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2200/aerj.v2i1.96Keywords:
Strategic Environmental Assessment, Environmental Law, Lacunae, Sustainable DevelopmentAbstract
Strategic Environmental Assessment [SEA] is a methodical process for examining the significance of decisions taken to ensure that environmental considerations and alternatives are addressed on parity with economic and social factors in policies, plans and programs [PPP] for developments. SEA counteracts some of the limitations of Environmental Impact Assessments [EIA] as they provide room for assessment of actions that transcends specific projects. EIAs, though firmly rooted in Kenya, take place after many strategic decisions have been made regarding specific projects. This paper not only discusses SEAs wholesomeness but also legal lacuna that negates its benefits as one of the tools for implementing environmental law objectives. It recommends that for SEA to be effective, it should either be explicit, or the definition and the provision of EIA expanded to include assessment of not only projects but also plans, policies and programs from universally spatial and sector-wide perspectives.
References
Abaza, H. (2000). Strengthening Future Environmental Assessment Practice: An International Perspective: [ Published in the Environmental Assessment in Developing and transitional Countries, edited by Norman Lee and Clive George: (John Wiley and Sons LTD]
Abuodha, J. O. Z. (2002). Environmental Impact Assessment of the Proposed Titanium Mining Project in Kwale District, Kenya. Environmental Impact Assessment Course of the School of Environmental Studies, Moi University, 10th –28th of June, 2002]
Ahmed, K., & Sanchez-Triana, E. (2008). Sea and Policy Formulation. In Ahmed Kulsum and Sanchez-Triana. Strategic Environmental Assessments for Policies: An Instrument for Good Governance. Washington D.C. The World Bank.
Briffet, C., Obbard, J. P., & Mackee, J. (2003). Towards SEA of the Developing Nations of Asia: [Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23 [2003] 171-196: www.elsevier.com/locate/eiar
Cabridgeshire Health Authority (2002). Cambridgeshire and Petersborough Structure Plan Review: Health Impact Review. Prepared by Land Use Consultants in Association with Anne Gordon, March 2002.
Contant, C. K., & Wiggind, L. L. (1993). Towards Defining and Assessing Cumulative Impacts, Practical and Theoretical Considerations In Environmental Analysis: The NEPA Experience. S.G.
Hildebad and J.B. Chanon [eds] Boca Rator, Florida: Lewis Publications] EU (2001). The European Union’s Directive on SEA.
Fisher, T. B. (2003). Strategic Environmental Assessment In Post Modern Times. In Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 23 Issue II of March 2003]
Kende-Robb, C., & Warren, Van W. III. (2008). Giving the Most Vulnerable a Voice. In Ahmed K.and Sanchez-Triana, E. (Eds.) Strategic Environmental Assessment for Policies: An Instrument for Good Governance. Washington D.C: The World Bank.
Lee, N. (2000). Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Assessments. Published in Lee Norman and Clive George’s, Edited, Environmental Assessments in Developing and Transitional Countries: Jon [ England; John Wiley and Sons Limited)
Noble, B. F. (2002). Canadian Experience with Strategic Environmental Assessment and Sustainability. In Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 22, Issue 1. p. 3
Okoth-Yogo, D. K., & Oluoch, J. (2008). Public Participation and Environmental Jurisprudence in Kenya: Education for Sustainable Development Paradigm. Moi University 4th Annual Conference.
Ortolano, L. (2008). Policy level Strategic Environmental Assessments: Process Integration and Incentives of Policy Proponents. In Ahmed Kulsum and Sanchez-Triana Ernesto. eds. Strategic Environmental Assessment for Policies: An Instrument for Good Governance. Washington D.C: The World Bank. pp. 11-36
Partidarin, M. R., & Clark, R. (Editors) (2000). Perspectives on Environmental Assessment. Lewis Publishers USA].
Partidorio, M. R. (1996). Strategic Environmental Assessment: Key Issues Emerging From Recent Practice. In Environmental Impact Assessment Review- Volume 16, no 1 1996.]
Sadler, B. V. (1996). Strategic Environmental Assessment Status; Challenges and Future Directions. Ministry of Housing, Spatial planning and the Environment-Interactional Study of the Effectiveness of the Environment. EIA commission of Netherlands, 1996.
Shepherd, A., & Orlando, L. (1996). Strategic Environmental Assessment For Sustainable Development. [Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 16, No. 4-6, 1996].
Sifuna, N. (2007). Environmental Impact Assessment Law and Practice. In The Moi University Law Journal, Vol.1 March 2007, No.2. Nairobi: Law Africa. p. 182
Situma, F. D. P. (1997). EIA, Evolution, Legal and Institutional Aspects. In: Tole M., [ed] Environmental Impact Assessment in Kenya: Theory and Practice. Academy Science Publishers.
Wang, Y., Morgan, R. K., & Kashore, M. (2003). Environmental Impact Assessment In the Peoples Republic of China: New Laws, Old Problems: [Environmental Impact Assessment Review]
World Bank & International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2007).Strategic
Environmental Assessment of the Kenya Forests Act 2005. www.worldbank.org/rural.Cases
Nzioka Muema and Others versus Tiomin Kenya LTD. HCCC No. 97 of 2001 at Mombasa. eKLR
Mwaniki Peter Kinuthia and 2 Others Versus Peter Njunguna Gicheha and 3 others. In the High Court of KenyA at Nairobi, Civil Case No. 313 of 2000[2006].
eKLR. Narok County Council and others versus National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), and others : National Environmental Tribunal Appeal NET/0 7 of 2006 un reported Odera Sam and Other versus NEMA, eKLR, 2006 Legislations Czech Environmental Impact Assessment Act, No. 244 of 1992 Environmental [Impact Assessment and Audit] Regulations (AAR) of 2003.
Environmental Management and Coordination Act, Legal Notice No. 8 (EMCA) of 1999 Physical Planning Act of 1996. Forest Act of 2005, Law of Kenya.
