Comparing the Economic Performance of Two Rice Technologies in West Kano Irrigation Scheme, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2200/aerj.v2i2.149Keywords:
Rice, Technology, Conventional Paddy System, SRI, WKISAbstract
The contributions of rice in alleviating hunger and poverty among rural households in Kenya has led to the belief that better rice technologies can contribute in enhancing the role of rice in poverty reduction. It is for this reason that this study attempts to analyse the economic performance of rice technologies and their effects to rural households in West Kano Irrigation Scheme (WKIS) of Western Kenya. The study involved a survey of 123 households on their rice farming activities and field experimental trials on Conventional paddy and Systems of Rice Intensification (SRI) technologies. Conventional paddy system is a method of rice production where about 21 days or older seedlings are transplanted. Random planting and smaller spacing, usually 20cm by 15cm spacing or less is maintained, with 2 to 3 seedlings per hill, while on the other hand, SRI is rice production technology which involves transplanting 8-12 days old seedlings to the main field in order to maximize the tillering potential with single seedling per hill, with a wider spacing. Results of the study indicated that 89% of the households produced rice for both consumption and commercial purposes. Findings also indicated that the SRI system saved about 64% of water compared to the conventional paddy system. Experimental results showed that the yield difference between Conventional paddy method and SRI when 12 days old transplanted seedlings for SRI were compared with 21 days old seedlings for Conventional paddy system, the yields for IR2793 rice variety when SRI was used increased by up to 33.4 % compared to Conventional paddy method. In the case of basmati 370 rice variety, SRI increased grain yield of up to 53.3 % compared to Conventional paddy method. The study reveals that SRI method of rice production saves about 64% of water compared to the Conventional method. Furthermore, net revenue margins for SRI was higher by KSh. 58,275 (US 583) per acre of land. In conclusion, therefore, there is need to adopt the SRI method of spacing 25cm by 25 cm, since water is a very scarce commodity in the study area. Hence, adoption of this SRI method of rice production would be an important instrument for poverty reduction among the rural households of West Kano irrigation scheme and Kenya at large.
References
Adofu, I, Shaibu, S. O., & Yakubu, S. (2010). The economic impact of improved agricultural technology on cassava productivity in Kogi state of Nigeria. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 1(1), 63-74.
Bola, A. A., Aliou, D., & Omonona, B. T. (2012, October). Impact of improved agricultural technology adoption on sustainable rice productivity and rural farmers’ welfare in Nigeria: A Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) technique. A paper presented at the African Economic Conference at Kigali, Rwanda.
Clayton, G. E. (1995). Economics principles and practices. USA: McGraw-Hill School Publishing Company.
Government of Kenya (2003). Central Bureau of Statistics. Poverty in Kenya. Nairobi, Central Bureau of Statistics and International Livestock Research Institute.
Government of Kenya (2005). Grain production in Kenya. Export Processing Zones Authority
Government of Kenya (2008). National rice development strategy (2008 – 2018). Ministry of Agriculture.
Government of Kenya (2013). West Kano irrigation scheme office records. National Irrigation Board.
Kim, D. H., Seo, J. N., Kim, H. S., & Lee, K. (2012). Estimation of productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes in the Korean offshore fisheries. Fish Sci, 78, 743-751.
Kipkorir, E. C. (2012a). Rice productivity, water and sanitation baseline survey report: Western Kenya rice irrigation schemes. Funded by the National Council of Science and Technology (NCST) through the “3 Competitive Science, Technology and Innovative Grant” (Ref: NCST/5/003/3rd STI CALL/188) for the project period 01 January 2011 to 01 January 2014.
Kipkorir, E. C. (2012b). Adapting system of rice intensification in West Kenya irrigation schemes. Funded by the National Council of Science and Technology (NCST) through the “3 Competitive Science, Technology and Innovative Grant” (Ref: NCST/5/003/3rd STI CALL/188) for the project period 01 January 2011 to 01 January 2014.
Mati, B. M. (2010). System of rice intensification(SRI): Growing more rice with less water. Practical Notes for SRI Farmers. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology and SRI Resource Centre, Mwea, Kenya.
Mukumbu, J. M. (1987). Determination of optimal enterprise mix and allocation of resources for West Kano irrigation scheme (Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis). University of Nairobi, Nairobi.
Norman, U. (2013, February 17). Non GMO- development of the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Madagascar. International journal of Agricultural sustainability. Retrieved from https://appprecautionaryprinciple.wordpress.com/2013/.../non-gmo-development-of-t
Ogundele, O. O., & Okoruwa, V. O. (2006). Technical efficiency differentials in rice production technologies in Nigeria. African Economic Research Consortium Research Paper 154, Nairobi.
Olielo, T. (2013). Food security problems in various income groups of Kenya. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 13(4), 1-13.
Singh, V. P., Shankar, U., & Bora, P. (2007). Feasibility study to support system of rice intensification (SRI). A study conducted for Sir Dorabji Tata Trust, Mumbai.
Sumukwo, J., Adano, W. R., Kiptui, M., Cheserek, G. J., & Kipkoech, A. K. (2013). Valuation of natural insurance demand for non-timber forest products in South Nandi, Kenya. Journal of emerging trends in economics and management sciences (JETEMS) 4 (1), 89 – 97
